aboriginal australians look more like the common ancestor, so do americal indians (purebloods), so do african subsaharans. it is just looks, it does not mean any superiority. but yes, even if it is a racist thing to say, white euro face is ONE of the possible "end branches".
the video is not only racist, it is incomplete. it should show "trees" of human facial morphology evoluiton, wiht end branches of not one but multiple facial prototypes. in that tree, aboriginals would wind up "lower" in evolvement, but constitute their own endpoint, and orientals might win up "higher" than whites. meaning even further away from the ape. if you take a mandarin chinese man, he will look less like an ape than the guy on whom the video ends.
no subject
aboriginal australians look more like the common ancestor, so do americal indians (purebloods), so do african subsaharans. it is just looks, it does not mean any superiority. but yes, even if it is a racist thing to say, white euro face is ONE of the possible "end branches".
the video is not only racist, it is incomplete. it should show "trees" of human facial morphology evoluiton, wiht end branches of not one but multiple facial prototypes. in that tree, aboriginals would wind up "lower" in evolvement, but constitute their own endpoint, and orientals might win up "higher" than whites. meaning even further away from the ape.
if you take a mandarin chinese man, he will look less like an ape than the guy on whom the video ends.